Friday, December 2, 2011

Fuhrer: Rwanadan Genocide



This week we cover the Tutsi Rwandan Genocide. It is important to note that even before the Genocide in Rwanda tensions had already been strained between the two native tribal groups of the land. In fact one could trace the conflict to even before the country gained independence (1962) all the way to European colonial rule when Belgium (and many other European countries) scrambled to colonize the valuable land and resources of Africa.

At the time of their occupation The Belgians favored the Tutsis and gave them an advantage over the Hutus socially and economically this sparked the animosity between the two groups which reached its breaking point on April 6 th 1994 when President Juvenal Habyarimani is assassinated. His death is blamed on the RPF (Rwanda Patriotic Front) and its mostly Tutsi members although Hutu extremists who wanted to use President Habyarimanis death as an excuse to take power could have just as easily carried out the assassination.

 In any case what comes next is a horrifying attack on Tutsi citizens that lasted a hundred days carried out for the most part by the Interahamwe a militia made up of young men not connected to the army but never the less instructed by the new Hutu government to carry out the attacks. In those hundred days nearly a million Rwandan’s are killed (the death toll is said to be 800,000 but other reports insist it is more.) and as the quote from Murambi rightly indicates “the rest of the world was watching Soccer in America…”commenting how unlike in the cases of the more well known genocides carried out in Europe, foreign assistance (and by foreign I mean Europe) closed itself off to Africa even though the conflict itself could be traced back to them.

The novel Murambi, Book of Bones is a story written by Senegalese Journalist Boubacar Boris Diop who along with 9 other prominent African writers travelled around in post genocide Rwanda to see what they as artists could do to make sure that the stories of those who suffered through are told.  The story itself centers itself around an ethnically mixed Rwandan named Cornelius Uvimana a History teacher who after nearly a long period of exile from his home in Djibouti finally is allowed to come back in 1994, four years after the Genocide. The novel itself is made up of four parts.

The first and third parts contain snippets of narratives that follow people who each had their own part to play in the Genocide this it seems to highlight that no ones hands were entirely clean of what had happened and demonstrates a human beings capacity to do good and commit evil. This idea most notably seen in Part three where Cornelius's father a well respected doctor of Hutu descent, betrays the trust of not only the Tutsi people he promises to save but also his wife and two children (His wife being of Tutsi descent) when he offers them sanctuary at a Polytechnic college (located in Murambi) but then allows the militia to surround it and kill everyone inside. This despicable act from someone who obviously must have been a good person at one point shows the very cold blooded nature that war insights in people and the fact that Joseph is not only willing but wanting to get rid of his Tutsi wife and his own children shows just how strong the hatred between the two groups really were.

Hotel Rwanda on the other hand tells the tale of Hutu hotel manager Paul Rusesabagina who like Joseph (Paul’s wife is also Tutsi) is given the chance to help hundreds of his Tutsi neighbors by allowing them refuge in the hotel he works in. The neighbors are then joined by hundreds more refugees who are sent to the hotel from over populated Red cross and United Nations refugee camps. His struggle to care for them, to negotiate their safe keeping and that of his family is contrasted by the UN peace keepers to assert themselves in to conflict as they are obliged to not intervene in Genocide. Instead they began to evacuate all expats living in Rwanda. This reluctance to help I believe is shown to its most dramatic effect when a journalist Jack Daglish who is just about to leave the hotel is asked by a Tutsi woman who he had a one night stand with to take her with him. He apologizes and tells the crying woman that he cannot then as he leaves he tells his friend “I feel so ashamed.” The comment itself seemingly directed at both the journalist’s and the foreign powers that didn’t find it necessary to intervene.

4 comments:

  1. I like how you traced the 1994 genocide back to it's roots in 1962, where Belgian powers took part in distingushing between Tutsi and Hutu ethnicities, thereby creating a gap of power and priviledge.
    The scene in Hotel Rwanda where the young Tutsi journalist explains how the Belgian colonists differentiated between Hutu and Tutsi based on nose-length and face-width is evident in this appearence-based strife.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I also wrote about how the difference between the tribes was negligible, and was happy to see that you also noted that it was an economic difference that sparked the true conflict between these tribes. You also made comment about the death toll being reported as 800,000 but possibly more, the main reason for the greater number that is reported is the death toll does not take into account those reported as missing, nearly 500,000, of which only a handful have been discovered as living. What makes those numbers so important though is the fact that this is a rare time when the international polling agency, the group who reported the numbers, typically includes those reported as missing in their final death if the time as missing exceeds 1 year. For the genocide in Rwanda it has been over a decade and those 400,000 plus are still missing but not presumed dead. This just goes to show how unimportant the world felt that Rwanda is, that they don't even deserve an accurate death toll.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I think you make a good connection between the journalist in Hotel Rwanda and the influence from the west. The journalist’s actions represent how the west acted towards the genocide in Rwanda. The west knew what was going on and had received footage yet they decided to walk away. Just like the reporter and the Tutsi woman, the west used Rwanda until they had no use for it anyone. At the time the west didn’t feel ashamed for not helping, however, the journalist felt the immediate effect of his actions and stated that he felt horrible for leaving.
    There were the few, such as Paul’s contact that try the best they can to help when they realize that Rwanda has truly been abandoned and that the west has decided not to care. They have decided to pretend to be oblivious to what is going on and say that genocide was not occurring. However, like the reporter, would the west also have abandoned the country even if they truly knew that there was a full-fledged genocide going on? I believe we would all like to think that the next time genocide occurs, those who can will step in to stop it. However, this may not always be the case.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Your discussion of Murambi is quite thoughtful.

    ReplyDelete