Friday, November 25, 2011

Fisher - Sarajevo


Sarajevo is the capital city of Bosnia. It was known to be a beautiful city with much culture and happy inhabitants. However, during the years of 1992-1996 the city was under siege during the Bosnian War. The siege of Sarajevo was muffled by the media during these years and little news about the on-goings in the area was heard. I was familiar with this terrible event at a young age as a grew up with an evacuee of Bosnia. My friend Amar and I grew up and went to school together since the tender age of 5. I knew he was from Europe, particularly a place called Bosnia, which I figured to be Eastern European. Sadly, this was the extent of my knowledge of his situation at the time. It was not until I entered high school that my mother explained his situation to me. She made me aware of the war and atrocity that he and his parents had fled from. Had I known this when we had gone to school together I don't know if I would have acted any differently toward him, or if I could have even grasped the concept of what his family (in US and Bosnia) was going through. Whatever the case would have been, we are still friends today and he returns to Bosnia quite often to visit his family there. Lucky for him, Sarajevo is the fastest growing city in Bosnia, and a bustling capital with a vibrant culture. I would love to visit with him next time he returns.

With that in mind, the discussion this week is on the book The Cellist of Sarajevo and the movie Welcome to Sarajevo. They show different perspectives of what went on in the city during the siege. The book follows three separate people who are linked by the appearance of a cellist whom played everyday for 22 days in the streets of Sarajevo. He was playing for the 22 innocent lives lost during a bombing. The cellist inspired thousands who heard of his cause and how he continued to play everyday despite threats to his life and proximity to constant danger. This was his way of standing up to oppression, and showing his resolve in the face of a "never-ending" siege upon his city and his people. The people in turn mimicked his resolve, and protected him when he played. The Cellist of Sarajevo gives the reader an image of the victim's standpoint during the siege of Sarajevo.

The movie, Welcome to Sarajevo, follows different groups of reporters who were in the city during the siege. There are those who seek fame, focus on a small section, or try to capture the entire tale. Either way, their efforts were to expose to the world what was happening in the streets of Sarajevo. Regardless of whether this was done for fame, the story, or to save lives, it needed to be done. People need to see what is happening to their fellow man, across the world or in their backyard. Every nation should be aware of what was happening in there, and these were the people to make sure that everyone knew. Yet, despite their efforts, the media turned a blind eye to what was happening in Bosnia. No one interceded on the innocent's behalf or stopped the mass killings. I suppose the world assumed things would work themselves out in 1992... 93.. 94... and so on. The truth must be told, the world cannot ignore the lives of countless innocents lost. We must pave the way the a new future, one where we are aware of the atrocities that mankind is capable of. We must have the knowledge and intelligence to choose other options, or crush ignorance before it rears its ugly head.

4 comments:

  1. What an insanely appropriate image...

    ReplyDelete
  2. When there are multiple problems going on in the world, what is the best course of action? Do you attack it all at once, do you take care of each problem one at a time, or do you believe the problem will go away on its own. Sometimes countries are at civil war with each other and terrible things like genocide are happening, but neither party wants outside help or outside involvement. They feel it is their land and it is their problem. The only problem is that the UN ranks it as their number one problem. Should they get involved? Also what side should the UN take? Sometimes if they choose one side over the other it could be an act of a holy war, or if you help another side you ruin relations with another country; and that much significantly larger country could declare war. Plus can the countries of the world afford to get involved.?
    Another question is how to address the complexity of the problem. It is difficult to educate people when they are in the middle of a war or mass genocide. Education has come to a halt, people all over are spread out either because they are at war or hiding, and certain individuals have power. How do you explain to someone that feels as if they have control that their actions are wrong. It is very similar to telling a cop he is wrong after he pulled you over. He is probably going to get angry and look for more problems.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I love how you mention the fact that no one stepped in to stop the killings. Yes, even the media turned its head to what was going on. Even the other journalist in Sarajevo thought it was time to throw in the towel on the story of the orphanage! However, Henderson realized that what was happening was not just a story. Thinking objectively was not the right way. When truly delving into what was happening Henderson became attached to the children and wanted to save them.

    ReplyDelete
  4. An excellent image. "With much culture and happy inhabitants"? A bit idealic, don't you think

    ReplyDelete